AI use cases stay vague and PoCs do not connect to business workflows
BrSE clarifies business intent, usable data, open issues, and acceptance criteria before implementation
XSCORE helps Japanese SIers and agencies deliver white-label enterprise AI/Web projects through use-case discovery, NDA and data-boundary checks, RAG / knowledge assistants, document AI, workflow automation, AI-enabled web apps, system integration, and production readiness gates. BrSE owns business intent, open issues, risks, acceptance criteria, review, and handover; Tech Leads own architecture and code quality; QA owns verification.
NDA → data boundary → readiness review. Every project starts with control.
Enterprise AI Adoption Factory
Primary offer
Intent / Risk / Acceptance
BrSE gate
NDA / Data boundary
Data trust
RAG / Doc AI / Workflow
AI use cases
For SIers and agencies, the risk is losing end-client trust when AI proposals ignore business workflows, data constraints, existing systems, or acceptance criteria. XSCORE reduces that risk with BrSE-led readiness gates.
AI use cases stay vague and PoCs do not connect to business workflows
BrSE clarifies business intent, usable data, open issues, and acceptance criteria before implementation
Confidential data and system-integration boundaries are unclear
NDA, data boundary, and API / DB / workflow-tool integration scope are checked before building
Responsibility across AI, offshore, and quality is hard to see
BrSE owns readiness gates, Tech Lead owns technical quality, and QA owns verification
A Vietnam team close to Japan work hours, with BrSE connecting business intent, data boundaries, and acceptance criteria. This is not generic low-cost offshore; it is a white-label delivery structure for SIers and agencies bringing AI into enterprise workflows.
Move from 30-minute fit check, NDA and data boundary, and Standard Review into only the roles needed for AI/Web delivery.
Meetings, Q&A, reviews, and walkthroughs can be designed around Japanese SIer owner and PM schedules.
RAG, document AI, workflow automation, AI-enabled web apps, and system integration are combined around project scope.
Business intent, open issues, data boundaries, risks, acceptance, review, and handover docs are structured before and during implementation.
A BrSE-led team helps Japanese SIers and agencies move from use cases, data boundaries, and governance to RAG, document AI, automation, web apps, system integration, and production readiness.
BrSE-led / Vietnam AI-Web Delivery Lab / Role-based T&M
RAG / Document AI / Workflow automation / AI-enabled apps
Business intent / Data boundary / Risk / Acceptance
Integration support for enterprise workflows
XSCORE does not present AI only as a coding accelerator. We build scoped RAG / knowledge assistants, document AI, workflow automation, AI-enabled web apps, and system integration inside data-boundary and human-approval gates.
Internal document search, FAQ, knowledge-base assistants, and sales/support/operations support are designed around approved data scope.
PDF, form, contract, and report extraction, summarization, classification, and comparison are implemented with review and acceptance criteria.
Approval flows, task routing, report generation, search, assistants, recommendation, generation, and classification are embedded into business web apps.
Integrations with existing web apps, databases, CRM/ERP, workflow tools, and APIs are scoped, verified, and handed over with QA results and docs.
AI is both delivered capability and delivery accelerator. BrSE, Tech Lead, and QA share responsibility for quality, context, security, accountability, and delivery decisions.
Data boundary: no secrets, PII, or customer-confidential documents go to external AI unless explicitly approved; redaction, anonymization, and human review gates apply.
Details and architecture can be shared during discussion. NDA available.
We do not push a fixed stack. We choose around requirements, existing environment, operations, and security constraints.
AI / LLM
Web / Business Apps
Infra / DevOps
BrSE does not replace Tech Lead or QA. BrSE owns business intent and readiness gates; Tech Lead owns technical quality; QA owns verification.
BrSE does more than translate. The role structures business intent, open issues, data boundaries, risks, and acceptance criteria so AI/Web implementation can move with clear decisions.
BrSE manages business intent, data boundaries, risks, and acceptance. Tech Lead owns architecture and code quality. QA owns verification. AI adoption moves in small, reviewable scopes.
BrSE structures the business use case, usable data, NDA needs, open issues, and risk register.
Confirm RAG, document AI, workflow automation, AI-enabled web apps, integration candidates, technical approach, and acceptance criteria.
The Vietnam AI/Web Delivery Lab builds scoped implementation and integration while Tech Lead checks architecture and code quality.
QA verifies the scope; BrSE organizes review points, remaining issues, handover docs, and next-phase decisions.
AI is the delivered capability and a delivery accelerator. Confidential-data usage is decided only after NDA and data-boundary checks.
After the 30-minute fit check, we confirm NDA and data boundaries, then run a BrSE-led AI/Web Production Readiness Review — Standard. The PDF Tech Proposal becomes the basis for a White-label Enterprise AI Delivery Lab.
Understand project background, end-client context, target business workflow, and the AI adoption scope to discuss.
Before detailed sharing, confirm NDA needs, usable data scope, and confidential-data handling.
Confirm where to start small: RAG, document AI, workflow automation, AI-enabled web apps, or system integration.
Clarify business intent, open issues, risks, AI workflow, technical approach, acceptance criteria, and required roles.
Prepare the PDF Tech Proposal and share decision points, remaining issues, and next-phase options in a 60-minute walkthrough.
Use the review result to propose role-based T&M or a BrSE-led Vietnam AI-Web Delivery Lab.
Start small and set the rhythm for implementation, integration, QA, review, handover docs, and continuous improvement.
The following are abstracted reference patterns by industry, problem, and support scope. Company names, logos, and detailed architectures are not public; shareable details can be discussed within an approved NDA scope.
After a 30-minute fit check, we clarify business AI use case, data boundary, AI workflow, technical approach, risks, acceptance criteria, and the next delivery lab setup. If the project moves forward, the review becomes the basis for a White-label Enterprise AI Delivery Lab or role-based T&M.
Price
From ¥300,000
Includes
Final quote depends on materials, stakeholders, and AI adoption scope. Development engagement is proposed separately after the review.
We first use 30 minutes to understand context, AI adoption theme, and data boundary before deciding whether a paid review is useful.
Book a 30-minute AI adoption readiness checkStart with a 30-minute call. NDA and data-boundary discussion available before deep-dive.
Questions SIers and agencies usually ask before offering enterprise AI adoption under their own brand.
Which business AI use case matters? Which data can be used? Should you start with RAG, document AI, workflow automation, AI-enabled web apps, or system integration? Start with 30 minutes; when useful, we run BrSE-led AI/Web Production Readiness Review — Standard.
NDA discussion / Data-boundary check / White-label AI/Web delivery